|
Why Estate Planning
Takes on Added Importance
Before discussing
some of the specifics of the Tax Relief Act, and what new estate planning
strategies you should implement as a result, you should consider some
factors involved in the bigger picture.
At first blush, one
might conclude that estate planning is a thing of the past; no estate
tax, therefore, no estate planning. In fact, this conclusion could not
be further from the truth. Why?
A significant estate tax continues to exist. The new law does not repeal
the estate tax until 2010; until that relatively distant date, the entire
estate tax system stays put. There will be 2 presidential elections and
4 congressional elections between the date of enactment of the Tax Relief
Act and 2010. A future Congress might delay the repeal date or "repeal
the repeal". In fact, built into the new law is a "sunset"
date of January 1, 2011, that automatically reinstates the estate tax
to its full 2001 level (unless Congress acts in the meantime) with a $1,000,000
exclusion and a top tax bracket of 55% to 60%.
Many experts, including myself, believe that total repeal of the estate
tax will never take place, and certainly there is no guarantee of repeal.
This means that all estate plans need to be flexible. Your estate plans
should be able to twist and turn as quickly as the law will during the
next 10 years.
Most estate tax rates do not budge from their present, high levels until
their scheduled repeal in 2010. Although the highest estate tax rate is
gradually reduced by 10 percentage points over nine years (plus 5 percent
attributable to the surtax for estates over $10 million), the rest of
the rates, which are the rates that apply to the bulk of taxable estates,
will not change. These rates range from 18 percent for taxable amounts
from $0 to $10,000, to 43 percent for amounts between $1.25 million and
$1.5 million mark.
Although it is a positive step, the increase in the estate tax exemption
(the amount of assets automatically freed from any estate tax liability)
is not substantial until 2009. In 2002 and 2003, for example, only $300,000
more in assets are exempt from estate tax than would have been under the
old rules. Add to the equation what inflation will do to the value of
these exemptions during the next 10 years, and it is clear that the new
exemptions will not provide the level of estate tax relief many estate
owners had hoped for.
The gift tax will not be repealed. This means that you may continue to
encounter problems in giving a son or daughter substantial funds for a
first home or an emergency, or passing a family business along to the
next generation gradually as a reward or incentive to continue your business.
Additionally, the amount of the exemption for gifts to a non-citizen spouse
is limited. In 2002, that exemption is only $110,000.
You will now need to contend (or, more accurately, your heirs will have
to contend) with additional income tax, scheduled to appeal on the scene
when (and if) the estate tax is phased out. Any individual with an estate
with a potential value exceeding $1.3 million (in post-2010 dollars) should
anticipate that the heirs may have to pay additional tax down the road
as a result of the new "carryover basis" rules.
State tax authorities will be pressured to continue a significant estate
tax on the state level to maintain much needed revenues. "Piggybacking"
state taxes to federal taxes, which many states now do, will become less
common. This means additional complexity for your total estate planning
strategy, as states begin to reach for a means to replace their "pickup
taxes," which will expire when (and if) the federal estate tax repeal
becomes effective in 2010.
As you can see, estate
planning has gotten more complex and, for many taxpayers, more important
than ever.
Next
>>
|